@article{VATS3986,
author = {Hideyuki Maeda and Tamami Isaka and Shota Mitsuboshi and Sayaka Katagiri and Kei Sakamoto and Hiroe Aoshima and Takuma Kikkawa and Takako Matsumoto and Kunihiro Oyama and Masahide Murasugi and Masato Kanzaki},
title = {Minimally invasive surgery for thymic epithelial tumors: a single institutional experience},
journal = {Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery},
volume = {2},
number = {8},
year = {2017},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasing to become the preferred surgical approach for anterior mediastinal tumors. This study reported our experience with MIS including video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for thymic epithelial tumors and compared the surgical results of MIS with those of conventional approaches (CAs).
Methods: Between March 2001 and December 2014, 129 patients underwent surgical treatment for thymic epithelial tumors at authors’ institute. Fifty-nine patients underwent MIS including VATS and RATS (MIS group) and 70 patients underwent CA such as median sternotomy and thoracotomy (CA group). The clinical outcomes between two groups were compared.
Results: The surgical procedures in MIS group included extended thymectomy in 8, total thymectomy in 4, right hemi-thymectomy in 24, and left hemi-thymectomy in 23 patients. The surgical procedures in CA group included extended thymectomy in 11, total thymectomy in 56, right hemi-thymectomy in 2, and left hemi-thymectomy in 1 patient. The mean tumor size was 35.6 mm in MIS group and 49.2 mm in CA group. The tumor size in MIS group was significantly smaller than CA group (P=0.0011). The number of patients with MG was 9 (15.3%) in VATS group and 11 (15.7%) in CA group, with no significant difference. The operating time, blood loss, duration of drainage, and length of hospital stay in MIS group were significantly less than those in CA group (P},
issn = {2519-0792}, url = {https://vats.amegroups.org/article/view/3986}
}